Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{ai}[foss/2023a] DeepSpeed v0.14.5, CUTLASS v3.4.0, DLPACK v0.8 w/ CUDA 12.1.1 #21438

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor

@VRehnberg VRehnberg commented Sep 18, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)
Requires:

Edit: It also patches an existing version of CUTLASS (instead of adding a new version as it did initially).

…tches: DeepSpeed-0.14.5_pic-compile.patch, DeepSpeed-0.14.2_no-ninja-dep.patch
@VRehnberg VRehnberg marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 14:52
@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Sep 18, 2024

Will probably want to change triton used to #21318

@VRehnberg VRehnberg marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 14:24
@VRehnberg VRehnberg changed the title {ai}[foss/2023a] DeepSpeed v0.14.5 w/ CUDA 12.1.1 {ai}[foss/2023a] DeepSpeed v0.14.5, CUTLASS v3.5.0, DLPACK v0.8 w/ CUDA 12.1.1 Sep 23, 2024
@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Sep 24, 2024

DLPack
Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-16 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6226R CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/9e271e35ebb3964a7749770e14eb3c42 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Sep 24, 2024

CUTLASS
Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-15 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6226R CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/01f85607114e140d887898842effea9f for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Sep 24, 2024

DeepSpeed
Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-06 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/5a708f22771e1d099be9f64a37d3eccb for a full test report.


Typo in test command after linebreaks.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-12 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/d519a58b098e8dcc932f3eaba43627cd for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Latest failures have in common that they use the multi-node launcher. Unsure if it's only the test that's broken or something else.

As an example of a failing command:

pdsh -S -f 1024 -w localhost export NCCL_IB_HCA=^mlx5_1; export PYTHONNOUSERSITE=1; export UCX_MODULE_DIR=[...]; export PYTHONPATH=[...]; /apps/Test2/software/Python/3.11.3-GCCcore-12.3.0/bin/python3 -u -m deepspeed.launcher.launch --world_info=eyJsb2NhbGhvc3QiOiBbMF19 --node_rank=%n --master_addr=127.0.0.1 --master_port=29500 /cephyr/NOBACKUP/priv/c3-staff/eb-tmp/eb-5t779o2m/pytest-of-c3-builder/pytest-0/test_user_args_True_I_m_going_0/user_arg_test.py --prompt "I\'m going to tell them \\"DeepSpeed is the best\\""\n'.decode

so probably is just because LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not also exported. Looking for where this command is built...

It seems like an add_export for that is missing here https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed/blob/v0.14.5/deepspeed/launcher/runner.py#L564-L578

So should just be to add it to https://github.com/microsoft/DeepSpeed/blob/v0.14.5/deepspeed/launcher/runner.py#L34

Will try that.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-02 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/03bc8fc4dfc955cd4a20c9c4f68a7fc8 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-02 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/7bcc5750617d9cc507edc761af91d199 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-01 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 1 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/1afe632871f634e216b2ee080529681f for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Oct 1, 2024

Compared the environment variables before and after loading the DeepSpeed module. Will probably update the pdsh-env-vars patch with those.

So remaining

  • Update pdsh-env-vars patch
  • Check deepspeed.env_report and see if everything was built alright
  • Run on some more hardware (especially Ampere or newer GPUs)
  • Get this reviewed by a maintainer

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Env report seems to indicate that pre-built ops are not being picked up properly:

--------------------------------------------------
DeepSpeed C++/CUDA extension op report
--------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Ops not installed will be just-in-time (JIT) compiled at
      runtime if needed. Op compatibility means that your system
      meet the required dependencies to JIT install the op.
--------------------------------------------------
JIT compiled ops requires ninja
ninja .................. [OKAY]
--------------------------------------------------
op name ................ installed .. compatible
--------------------------------------------------
async_io ............... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
fused_adam ............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
cpu_adam ............... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
cpu_adagrad ............ [NO] ....... [OKAY]
cpu_lion ............... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
 [WARNING]  Please specify the CUTLASS repo directory as environment variable $CUTLASS_PATH
evoformer_attn ......... [NO] ....... [NO]
 [WARNING]  NVIDIA Inference is only supported on Ampere and newer architectures
 [WARNING]  FP Quantizer is using an untested triton version (2.1.0), only 2.3.0 and 2.3.1 are known to be compatible with these kernels
fp_quantizer ........... [NO] ....... [NO]
fused_lamb ............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
fused_lion ............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
inference_core_ops ..... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
cutlass_ops ............ [NO] ....... [OKAY]
transformer_inference .. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
quantizer .............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
ragged_device_ops ...... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
ragged_ops ............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
random_ltd ............. [NO] ....... [OKAY]
 [WARNING]  sparse_attn requires a torch version >= 1.5 and < 2.0 but detected 2.1
 [WARNING]  using untested triton version (2.1.0), only 1.0.0 is known to be compatible
sparse_attn ............ [NO] ....... [NO]
spatial_inference ...... [NO] ....... [OKAY]
transformer ............ [NO] ....... [OKAY]
stochastic_transformer . [NO] ....... [OKAY]
--------------------------------------------------
DeepSpeed general environment info:
torch install path ............... ['/apps/Test2/software/PyTorch/2.1.2-foss-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1/lib/python3.11/site-packages/torch']
torch version .................... 2.1.2
deepspeed install path ........... ['/apps/Test2/software/DeepSpeed/0.14.5-foss-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1/lib/python3.11/site-packages/deepspeed']
deepspeed info ................... 0.14.5+unknown, unknown, unknown
torch cuda version ............... 12.1
torch hip version ................ None
nvcc version ..................... 12.1
deepspeed wheel compiled w. ...... torch 2.1, cuda 12.1
shared memory (/dev/shm) size .... 377.03 GB

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
alvis6-11 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A40, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/d35d54e5f5c7926d09cd494d1addf826 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (3 easyconfigs in total)
alvis3-36 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/f4f23e0b89d8a5b5304d352fe0f04964 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Three failing files in latest 4xA100 run:

  1. tests/unit/inference/quantization/test_intX_quantization.py
  2. tests/unit/ops/aio/test_aio.py
  3. tests/unit/runtime/zero/test_nvme_checkpointing.py

Can't reproduce them when skipping test step and running them manually (though first one is unclear as it fails for another reason).

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems mostly fine now, rerunning build on Ampere GPU.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis3-26 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/ce9fbac4ad17af130fbde5c5069bdd41 for a full test report.

Comment on lines +26 to +30
+EXPORT_ENVS += [ # Extra based on what's added by module load DeepSpeed
+ 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH', 'PATH', 'EB', 'TRITON', 'CUDA', # important
+ 'ACLOCAL', 'CMAKE', 'CPATH', 'LIBRARY_PATH', 'MPL', 'NCCL',
+ 'PKG_CONFIG_PATH', 'XDG_DATA_DIRS',
+]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm on the fence on if all of these should be included or not. The alternative is to reduce these and add them case by case with a .deepspeed_env file. https://www.deepspeed.ai/getting-started/#multi-node-environment-variables

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

One issue with virtualenv --system-site-package. Not unique to this ec, but still something that would be good to fix if I can find a solution.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

One issue with virtualenv --system-site-package. Not unique to this ec, but still something that would be good to fix if I can find a solution.

Hopefully solved now in easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-17 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/4ec5a1dc6936d73cd0d3d3fd3a20653b for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-23 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/baa11497e89a38a9865cdc5493516019 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Last failure was from two quantized nvme offload tests. Either error is because nvme_path is not actually pointing to NVME on that machine or it's this microsoft/DeepSpeed#5124. Stack trace was unhelpful, will try to reproduce manually.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-27 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/d16a7398d9415427fdb92fc835e6871f for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Nov 5, 2024

FAILED

Meh, thought I was done. Why have new errors popped up :(

  • Missing import mpi4py
    • Sure reasonable dependency easily fixed.
  • ImportError: dynamic module does not define module export function (PyInit_transformer_op)
    • I've seen this before, thought it was solved now when ops built correctly apparently not. No idea what's causing it.
    • Edit: This was caused by LD_LIBRARY_PATH not being exported for runtest+testinstall fixed in easyblock
  • RuntimeError: "addmm_impl_cpu_" not implemented for 'Half'
    • get_accelerator() must have incorrectly output "cpu" instead of "cuda".

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Updated software DLPack-0.8-GCC-12.3.0.eb

Diff against DLPack-0.8-GCC-11.3.0.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-11.3.0.eb

diff --git a/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-11.3.0.eb b/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-12.3.0.eb
index 97be9746c5..30c8128f84 100644
--- a/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-11.3.0.eb
+++ b/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-12.3.0.eb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ homepage = 'https://dmlc.github.io/dlpack/latest/'
 description = """DLPack is a stable in-memory data structure for an ndarray
 system to interact with a variety of frameworks."""
 
-toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '11.3.0'}
+toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '12.3.0'}
 
 github_account = 'dmlc'
 source_urls = [GITHUB_LOWER_SOURCE]
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ sources = ['v%(version)s.tar.gz']
 checksums = ['cf965c26a5430ba4cc53d61963f288edddcd77443aa4c85ce722aaf1e2f29513']
 
 builddependencies = [
-    ('CMake', '3.24.3'),
+    ('CMake', '3.26.3'),
 ]
 
 sanity_check_paths = {
Diff against DLPack-0.3-GCC-10.3.0.eb

easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.3-GCC-10.3.0.eb

diff --git a/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.3-GCC-10.3.0.eb b/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-12.3.0.eb
index c487f04f84..30c8128f84 100644
--- a/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.3-GCC-10.3.0.eb
+++ b/easybuild/easyconfigs/d/DLPack/DLPack-0.8-GCC-12.3.0.eb
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
 easyblock = 'CMakeMake'
 
 name = 'DLPack'
-version = '0.3'
+version = '0.8'
 
 homepage = 'https://dmlc.github.io/dlpack/latest/'
 description = """DLPack is a stable in-memory data structure for an ndarray
 system to interact with a variety of frameworks."""
 
-toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '10.3.0'}
+toolchain = {'name': 'GCC', 'version': '12.3.0'}
 
 github_account = 'dmlc'
 source_urls = [GITHUB_LOWER_SOURCE]
 sources = ['v%(version)s.tar.gz']
-checksums = ['703149f5b39ead42cc734c03c7c4bd581fcad1c5a3939e7a4b5bc82f54c3c32a']
+checksums = ['cf965c26a5430ba4cc53d61963f288edddcd77443aa4c85ce722aaf1e2f29513']
 
 builddependencies = [
-    ('CMake', '3.20.1'),
+    ('CMake', '3.26.3'),
 ]
 
 sanity_check_paths = {

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Nov 8, 2024

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-15 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/6c0b6af62d404244d15ec8f6d3d1dc33 for a full test report.


Another preciously unseen error. Seg-fault in test_compile_zero.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Nov 11, 2024

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis3-21 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/3aea638f9cfb8e5d88fef6fb737ff7b2 for a full test report.


Unknown error when building wheel, don't think anything has changed from before.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-04 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 2 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/1f1282358bf2e9fff774d47ce35599f0 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-18 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/123208d9718223547670a43a4832f542 for a full test report.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis1-09 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6244 CPU @ 3.60GHz, 2 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 560.35.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/e2dd6f6b643bc2a197e8472b0f48679b for a full test report.

@VRehnberg VRehnberg changed the title {ai}[foss/2023a] DeepSpeed v0.14.5, CUTLASS v3.5.1, DLPACK v0.8 w/ CUDA 12.1.1 {ai}[foss/2023a] DeepSpeed v0.14.5, CUTLASS v3.4.0, DLPACK v0.8 w/ CUDA 12.1.1 Nov 12, 2024
@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Nov 12, 2024

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-28 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/246df5e396a2f7020bde0b5fb1c497dd for a full test report.


Here's the build error again. Mostly confused why it only appears some times. Perhaps, need to actually fix it.

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

VRehnberg commented Nov 12, 2024

Test report by @VRehnberg
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3450
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
alvis4-28 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz, 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 545.23.08, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/VRehnberg/3b3629b684c865b5c5cb9e5c5ac6407f for a full test report.


Build failures mostly seem flaky. Only change with this one to the one before

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

There seems to still be something flaky about the build step. But, I have no idea what it could be.

At this point I'd welcome others testing and see if they also experience this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant