Dean's List x Tiplink : Technical Review Bounty

[untiedbear]

Bounty Description

Objective

Conduct a detailed technical review of Tiplink, focusing on usability, functionality, and technical soundness.

Reward

$300 USDC for a comprehensive review that adheres to the outlined criteria.

Relevant Links

• Product Repository: GitHub Repository
• Documentation: Product Documentation

Submission Requirements

• Create a Markdown File: Submit your findings in a markdown file named <GitHub_username>-tiplink-review.md.
• Detail Your Findings: Include a detailed assessment covering the general tasks and, depending on product accessibility, either the code-specific tasks (if open source) or API/documentation-based tasks (if not open source).

Review Criteria

General Tasks (Applicable to All)

• Usability and Design: Evaluate the ease of use and design aesthetics.
• Feature Assessment: Review the completeness and functionality of features.

Additional Tasks Based on Product Accessibility

Choose the appropriate section based on whether the product's code is accessible:

If Code is Accessible (Open Source)

• Code Quality: Assess readability, documentation, and maintainability.
• Security Review: Identify and highlight any obvious security vulnerabilities or issues. This review is intended to catch surface-level security concerns and is not a substitute for a comprehensive security audit.
• Performance: Evaluate code efficiency and resource usage.

If Code is Not Accessible

• API Usability and Documentation: Review the comprehensiveness and clarity of API documentation.
• Performance Analysis: Based on public interfaces, assess performance metrics.

How to Submit Your Work

1. Complete Your Review: Compile your findings into the specified markdown file, addressing the general assessment and the additional tasks as applicable to the accessibility of the product.
2. Submit a Pull Request: Submit your document as a pull request to this repository.
3. Link to This Issue: Ensure to reference this issue in your pull request for proper tracking.

Evaluation and Reward

• Comprehensive Coverage: Submissions will be evaluated based on thoroughness, accuracy, and the utility of the feedback.
• Adherence to Criteria: Ensure all relevant sections are covered as per the product's accessibility.

Thank you for your contributions to enhancing the quality and security of Tiplink! — Dean's List team.

[ritrafa]

Working on this one 🫡

[ritrafa]

Made good progress, completed an initial review and general implementation test using TipLink's docs. Will finish a code review and summary tomorrow, and I requested an additional api key from the team for one final implementation test. I plan to submit tomorrow, thanks!

[iam-joey]

Can i work on this?

[untiedbear]

Made good progress, completed an initial review and general implementation test using TipLink's docs. Will finish a code review and summary tomorrow, and I requested an additional api key from the team for one final implementation test. I plan to submit tomorrow, thanks!

@ritrafa

Thanks for working on this and your detailed update. Looking forward to your submission tomorrow.

[untiedbear]

Can i work on this?

@iam-joey

Everyone iss welcome to submit their work, more submissions make our process better and lead us to the best results. Just remember, we pick the review that fits the best, but we really appreciate everyones effort.

[ritrafa]

Thanks @untiedbear, I have submitted #9 , thank you!