Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Packaging Base Material #4

Open
yunusdawji opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 24 comments
Open

Packaging Base Material #4

yunusdawji opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 24 comments

Comments

@yunusdawji
Copy link

Hi,

I am looking for cheaper alternatives for the packaging substrate. I see that N5000 and FR370HR have been used. I was wondering if there are cheaper more commonly used alternative? Also I see the chip need 30uin gold on top layer. I have in past used 2uin immersion gold (by mistake) and they bonded quite nicely. Do you think I could use 2uin or 3uin gold on top layer

Yunus

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Jan 12, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply. I am looking to save whatever I can. If I do with pcbway.com, they are charging 1k for 100 boards but they don't any BT-epoxy based base material. We don't have big fundings right now, so whatever we can save is good.

We will most like use quickpak for wirebonding, so I will ask them.

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Jan 12, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

yunusdawji commented Jan 12, 2021

Thanks for the ideas. Guys at PCB way suggested TU-862 HF. This material has similar Tg as N5000, same permitivity and CTE. I will ask the ppl at quickpak if they can work with substrate. I will let you know how it goes.

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Hi Prof.,

One more question. I see in an image that on BSG Motherboard has an ironwood reusable socket. How does that interface with chip packaging substrate and where can I buy this socket?

Yunus

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Jan 20, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply. Yeah it would be great if you can give us the part number/datasheet for socket. We are using quickpak for assembly, so I think they will be familiar. But if you have dimensions for encapsulation, then that should be good aswell.

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Jan 20, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Ok thanks! Our tapeout is in couple of days, so we should be there in soon.

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Jan 20, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Hi,

I was wondering I could get access to this wiki. https://bitbucket.org/taylor-bsg/bsg_fpga/wiki/Home

We want to test our loopback board.

Thanks

Yunus

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Feb 26, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

We are about to fabricate the substrate for wire bonding and I have couple of questions.

  1. Does the thickness of pcb package matters for the iron wood socket? Or that can be adjusted using the screw.
  2. Do the pcb package needs gold bumps on underside or just a gold finish is good enough?
  3. Is this the correct package files for the ironwood socket?
    https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_packaging/blob/master/ucsd_bga_332/pcb/for_fab_sierra_proto_express/UCSD001_Gerber_2014-05-21.zip
    https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_packaging/blob/master/ucsd_bga_332/pcb/for_socket_maker_ironwood/SO47885.pdf

Thanks

Yunus

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Oct 21, 2021

@gaozihou can also fill in some of these questions; my guesses:

I assume when you say pcb package, you mean the substrate itself.

  1. not especially (could be wrong on this)
  2. I believe the bumps on the bottom of the substrate are just standard solderballs, there is no gold. the bumps are placed on there by the assembly house.
  3. LGTM; paul can confirm

@gaozihou
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @yunusdawji, here is the link to detailed information of the Ironwood socket: https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_motherboards/blob/master/bsg_trouble/real_trouble/misc_docs/C16459%20Dwg.PDF

  1. It is not recommended to be too much thicker than the original design (31mil, 0.7mm). Although the compression screw is adjustable, the shoulder screws and socket lid are fixed. If the assembled chip is too thick then it will be hard to install the lid. As shown in the PDF, the recommended total assembled thickness (substrate + encapsulation) is 0.7mm + 1mm = 1.7mm. We also tried 2mm before, which worked but it was tricky to close the lid...
  2. The BGA substrate must have soft bondable gold for all "bumps" (I guess you meant bond pads right). Gold finish (like ENIG) is not ideal for wire bond design. Please refer to this doc for fabrication guidelines: https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_packaging/blob/master/ucsd_bga_332/pcb/for_fab_sierra_proto_express/Q219234-5.docx
  3. Yes, this is the correct Gerber.
  4. When assembling (packaging) the BGA, the solder ball must be 0.6mm in diameter to be compatible with the Ironwood socket. Please refer to this doc for detailed specs: https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_packaging/blob/master/ucsd_bga_332/pinouts/bsg_two/common/to_assembly_house/example_files_for_assembly_house/assembly_build_sheet_bsg_ten.pdf

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Oct 21, 2021

Definitely soft gold for the bondpads. For the bottom of the substrate where the solder balls go, I am not sure whether they ever asked us. To be clear though, these are questions that you typically ask your assembly house, and they will tell you what they want and then you relay back that to the substrate fab people.

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply! I see in one of the document there are bumps on underside but maybe its just illustration.

Also I see for uw bga you have ENIPIG finish in the stack up document. Can ENIPIG work?

https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_packaging/blob/master/uw_bga/pcb/UWCS001_BGA_A03_PAUL_MODIFIED_2_fab.pdf

@gaozihou
Copy link
Contributor

gaozihou commented Oct 22, 2021

Hi @yunusdawji,
I would suggest asking the assembly house about ENEPIG finish for gold wire bond, different assembly house may have different requirements.

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Oct 22, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

yunusdawji commented Oct 22, 2021 via email

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

yunusdawji commented Oct 22, 2021

Sorry one more thing for the package substrate, are there solder balls on the underside of your chip? I dont see anything in this chip in youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pumrNqkXjfI&list=PLD1QnhK1caR3IrAtVAd1-leMkus7dVy6a&index=18

@gaozihou
Copy link
Contributor

gaozihou commented Oct 22, 2021

Hi @yunusdawji,
Yes, it needs 0.6mm solder balls on the underside of the BGA substrate to be compatible with the Ironwood socket.

@yunusdawji
Copy link
Author

yunusdawji commented Oct 22, 2021 via email

@taylor-bsg
Copy link
Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Oct 22, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants