-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Packaging Base Material #4
Comments
How many substrates are you trying to make? most of the cost is in the NRE
anyway, but if you are planning to make 1000's, maybe it would make a
difference.
The gold used on the top is based on what the assembly house is okay with
-- usually there are a few emails between you, the assembly house and
package fab to resolve this. If you are the assembly house, then you can do
whatever you and the substrate fab agree to. =)
M
…On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 2:21 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for cheaper alternatives for the packaging substrate. I see
that N5000 and FR370HR have been used. I was wondering if there are cheaper
more commonly used alternative? Also I see the chip need 30uin gold on top
layer. I have in past used 2uin immersion gold (by mistake) and they bonded
quite nicely. Do you think I could use 2uin or 3uin gold on top layer
Yunus
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AGIXBM6U3TQAVI53K3SZN2WDANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Thanks for the reply. I am looking to save whatever I can. If I do with pcbway.com, they are charging 1k for 100 boards but they don't any BT-epoxy based base material. We don't have big fundings right now, so whatever we can save is good. We will most like use quickpak for wirebonding, so I will ask them. |
Well that would be cool if you can pull it off! Most packaging is optimized
for 10 year kinds of reliability and potential life or death consequences
of failure, and probably you need much less. In that case,...
I would ask the assembly house about whether there would be any issues in
attaching solder balls and bond wires to FR4 (or high temp FR4 if it is
better for them.) The other issues are lower performance and less
reliability due to thermal expansion, but presumably those bond wires have
a little bit of flex in them.
…On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:17 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I am looking to save whatever I can. If I do with
pcbway.com, they are charging 1k for 100 boards but they don't any
BT-epoxy based base material. We don't have big fundings right now, so
whatever we can save is good.
We will most like use quickpak for wirebonding, so I will ask them.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AGZDORTED6YK7PM7MTSZOPKTANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Thanks for the ideas. Guys at PCB way suggested TU-862 HF. This material has similar Tg as N5000, same permitivity and CTE. I will ask the ppl at quickpak if they can work with substrate. I will let you know how it goes. |
Hi Prof., One more question. I see in an image that on BSG Motherboard has an ironwood reusable socket. How does that interface with chip packaging substrate and where can I buy this socket? Yunus |
New material: cool!
Ironwood socket is custom, we can give you the part number. Tell your
assembly house what the dimensions are when they do encapsulation. Socket
has some PCB decal pattern as direct attach, but you need a little more
space around it, and some holes for the retention clips.
M
…On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:56 AM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Prof.,
One more question. I see in an image that on BSG Motherboard has an
ironwood reusable socket. How does that interface with chip packaging
substrate and where can I buy this socket?
Yunus
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AFYP7EK7LI3RQ7YR43S2XBU7ANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Thanks for the reply. Yeah it would be great if you can give us the part number/datasheet for socket. We are using quickpak for assembly, so I think they will be familiar. But if you have dimensions for encapsulation, then that should be good aswell. |
If you are doing Quickpak then you are fine and can just wait until you are
packaging your die and we’ll give you all the info
…On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:12 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Yeah it would be great if you can give us the part
number/datasheet for socket. We are using quickpak for assembly, so I think
they will be familiar. But if you have dimensions for encapsulation, then
that should be good aswell.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5ABLHGSQKIPI4CUTK5DS2YNYJANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Ok thanks! Our tapeout is in couple of days, so we should be there in soon. |
Good luck!
…On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:20 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Ok thanks! Our tapeout is in couple of days, so we should be there in soon.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AAQIEV42WMLNP42TVTS2YOTLANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Hi, I was wondering I could get access to this wiki. https://bitbucket.org/taylor-bsg/bsg_fpga/wiki/Home We want to test our loopback board. Thanks Yunus |
Just to refresh my memory, what components are you using in the system?
…On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:52 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering I could get access to this wiki.
https://bitbucket.org/taylor-bsg/bsg_fpga/wiki/Home
We want to test our loopback board.
Thanks
Yunus
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AG5SOTA6AAFPK3H7GDTA4SJ7ANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
We are about to fabricate the substrate for wire bonding and I have couple of questions.
Thanks Yunus |
@gaozihou can also fill in some of these questions; my guesses: I assume when you say pcb package, you mean the substrate itself.
|
Hi @yunusdawji, here is the link to detailed information of the Ironwood socket: https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/bsg_motherboards/blob/master/bsg_trouble/real_trouble/misc_docs/C16459%20Dwg.PDF
|
Definitely soft gold for the bondpads. For the bottom of the substrate where the solder balls go, I am not sure whether they ever asked us. To be clear though, these are questions that you typically ask your assembly house, and they will tell you what they want and then you relay back that to the substrate fab people. |
Thanks for the reply! I see in one of the document there are bumps on underside but maybe its just illustration. Also I see for uw bga you have ENIPIG finish in the stack up document. Can ENIPIG work? |
Hi @yunusdawji, |
To be clear “assembly is king” — you ask the assembly house what they
require and then talk to the substrate fabrication house. Fabrication house
will tell what is convenient for them versus what assembly will want.
…On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 5:11 PM Paul Gao ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @yunusdawji <https://github.com/yunusdawji>,
I would suggest asking the fabrication house about ENEPIG finish for gold
wire bond, different fab house may have different requirements.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5ACLWCTP34KKGYVMFDDUICT2ZANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Ok. I will tell them to do electrolytic gold. QP needs 8-15 uin of gold in
ENEPIG but I have never seen this with any PCB manufacturer. The most I
have seen is 4uin.
…On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:36 PM taylor-bsg ***@***.***> wrote:
To be clear “assembly is king” — you ask the assembly house what they
require and then talk to the substrate fabrication house. Fabrication house
will tell what is convenient for them versus what assembly will want.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 5:11 PM Paul Gao ***@***.***> wrote:
> Hi @yunusdawji <https://github.com/yunusdawji>,
> I would suggest asking the fabrication house about ENEPIG finish for gold
> wire bond, different fab house may have different requirements.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
>
>
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <
#4 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5ACLWCTP34KKGYVMFDDUICT2ZANCNFSM4V6ITWXA
>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA7VRDXGC74TDWX6DF4AWDUIC5YPANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Sorry one more thing for the package substrate, are there solder balls on the underside of your chip? I dont see anything in this chip in youtube video. |
Hi @yunusdawji, |
Ok thanks.
…On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:17 PM Paul Gao ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @yunusdawji <https://github.com/yunusdawji>,
Yes, it needs 0.6mm solder balls on the underside of the BGA substrate to
use the Ironwood socket.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABA7VRGZ6OSW3VE24DBHS33UIDCTRANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Haha no solder balls on the bottom of the substrate, even though the die has
been mounted and wirebonded -- good catch. Yeah, that is a little weird.
M
…On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 7:11 PM Yunus Dawji ***@***.***> wrote:
Sorry one more thing for the package substrate, are there solder balls on
the underside of your chip? I dont see anything in this chip in youtube
video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pumrNqkXjfI&list=PLD1QnhK1caR3IrAtVAd1-leMkus7dVy6a&index=18
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFG5AGTQAQDUWAVKQQWHLLUIDB3VANCNFSM4V6ITWXA>
.
|
Hi,
I am looking for cheaper alternatives for the packaging substrate. I see that N5000 and FR370HR have been used. I was wondering if there are cheaper more commonly used alternative? Also I see the chip need 30uin gold on top layer. I have in past used 2uin immersion gold (by mistake) and they bonded quite nicely. Do you think I could use 2uin or 3uin gold on top layer
Yunus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: