You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
biblatex knows various schemes for sorting. From section 3.1.2:
The sorting order of the bibliography. Unless stated otherwise, the entries are sorted
in ascending order. The following choices are available by default:
nty Sort by name, title, year.
nyt Sort by name, year, title.
nyvt Sort by name, year, volume, title.
anyt Sort by alphabetic label, name, year, title.
anyvt Sort by alphabetic label, name, year, volume, title.
ynt Sort by year, name, title.
ydnt Sort by year (descending), name, title.
none Do not sort at all. All entries are processed in citation order.
count Sort in descending order of number of times cited
debug Sort by entry key. This is intended for debugging only.
I really like that AsciiDoc is standardized, i.e. there are no flavors. I'm therefore thinking that it would be nice if asciidoc-bibtex would be as similar to bibtex/biblatex as possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
biblatex knows various schemes for sorting. From section 3.1.2:
I really like that AsciiDoc is standardized, i.e. there are no flavors. I'm therefore thinking that it would be nice if asciidoc-bibtex would be as similar to bibtex/biblatex as possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: