-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resolve #1645 | stop subscription immediately even when there are pen… #1755
Open
pkasperowicz
wants to merge
5
commits into
allegro:master
Choose a base branch
from
pkasperowicz:Batch-subscription-should-be-stoppable-despite-of-pending-message-retries
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
96c3fd2
resolve #1645 | stop subscription immediately even when there are pen…
pkasperowicz 7ec469d
Merge branch 'master' into Batch-subscription-should-be-stoppable-des…
pkasperowicz f3e814b
resolve #1645 | refactor stop method not to be called twice when stop…
pkasperowicz d6fdb6c
Merge branch 'master' into Batch-subscription-should-be-stoppable-des…
pkasperowicz d302475
Merge branch 'master' into Batch-subscription-should-be-stoppable-des…
szczygiel-m File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pkasperowicz are you sure we need this ? The
stop()
method is actually called in afinally
block in therun()
method. The maintry
block in therun()
method is stopped whenrunning.flag
is set to false.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When the stop signal is received, we need to inform the consumer to stop consuming events.
stop()
invokesconsumer.tearDown()
and it setsBatchConsumer.consuming = false
.It informs
Retryer
to stop retrying messages. Without that we need to wait for all reties to be finished and it is blocking that way the main loop.Alternative approach might be extending the API of BatchConsumer to receive stop signal and mark it as some boolean e.g.
stopSignalReceived
. This flag would be informative forRetryer
to stop the process of retries.What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok I see it will work, can we avoid duplicated calling
stop()
method ? For example we can write method like this:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@faderskd ok changed it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pkasperowicz thank you, +1