Memory leak

[erfan-khadem]

There is / has been a memory leak issue since at least version 1.8.9. I have tested the latest release, and it is leaking at a rate of about 1.7 GB for every 100 GB of traffic proxied, during a time frame of 24 hours and with 50 active users. I have not done experiments to correlate these numbers with each other, but it seems like the amount of leaked memory is proportional to the served traffic. There is also no ceiling to this, it just grows until systemd-oomd kills it. I have tried using vless only, vless+vmess and vless+trojan, and avoided the newly added transports but to no avail. I would be more than happy to experiment more and provide the team with more information. I am running xray behind haproxy and that behind cloudflare CDN.

OS: Ubuntu 22.04, all packages up-to-date.
Architecture: Armv8, Neoverse-N1 at Hetzner. Also generic x86 platforms.
Memory: 4GB
Kernel: Generic Ubuntu 5.15.0-xxx
Logging: Disabled

[erfan-khadem]

heap.zip
Here is the result of heap profiling using pprof. memory usage was about 800MB when I took this profile.

[GFW-knocker]

@er888kh
what kind of transmission do you use?
i know that grpc has memory leak in 1.8.0+ above
but ws is rather fine in my experience

[50infivedays]

same problem , in my experience , version 1.8.4 is fine , and after that version , xray will leak

[RPRX]

same problem , in my experience , version 1.8.4 is fine , and after that version , xray will leak

麻烦逐个测试 v1.8.4 至 v1.8.6 之间的 commits，看一下哪个 commit 出现该问题

@er888kh 你那边也是这样吗？

[yuhan6665]

heap.zip Here is the result of heap profiling using pprof. memory usage was about 800MB when I took this profile.

From this pprof, the biggest is at readv reader with 220MB. Although I'm not sure if this is indeed a leak. Can you profile a bigger usage? (Or reduce the buffer size to isolate the issue)

[GektorUA]

Same issue on MT7981A (ARM64, cortex A53) with 512MB RAM, have try 1.8.4 and 1.8.10, both consume all RAM on device after first speedtest running and hangs, switch to sing-box 1.8.10 without change anything on server side (xray-core 1.8.10) and have no issues with memory consumption (~180 MB RAM after 10 and more tests).

P.S.
buffer-size is set to 4

[amirhosss]

Same issue on MT7981A (ARM64, cortex A53) with 512MB RAM, have try 1.8.4 and 1.8.10, both consume all RAM on device after first speedtest running and hangs

Same problem when running speedtest with chain-proxy config and using Xray-Core

[taoabc]

Same problem

[shakibamoshiri]

my VM faced an OS crash yesterday because of OOM.

here is the screenshot of the console after the crash

never did profiling for xray , but could it be for memory leaks ?
protocol: vless-grpc
number of users: around 30/40
number of concurrent users : 10/15
OS : Debian 11 x64
physical memory: 1G
swap : off
xray : Xray 1.8.7 (Xray, Penetrates Everything.) 3f0bc13 (go1.21.5 linux/amd64)

total-vm: 2558796KB
anon-rss: 561376KB
file-rss: 0KB

which protocol has the least memory leak ?

did not have full console access and so was not able to recover the OS; I had to rebuild it and no further logs

[taoabc]

my VM faced an OS crash yesterday because of OOM.

here is the screenshot of the console after the crash

never did profiling for xray , but could it be for memory leaks ? protocol: vless-grpc number of users: around 30/40 number of concurrent users : 10/15 OS : Debian 11 x64 physical memory: 1G swap : off xray : Xray 1.8.7 (Xray, Penetrates Everything.) 3f0bc13 (go1.21.5 linux/amd64)

total-vm: 2558796KB anon-rss: 561376KB file-rss: 0KB

which protocol has the least memory leak ?

did not have full console access and so was not able to recover the OS; I had to rebuild it and no further logs

I updated to 1.8.11, seems it's been mitigated. While it's easy to repro when I use 1.8.10

[EldestBard]

same problem on the latest version 1.18.13.

[masbur]

I'm using version 1.8.16 and problem solved. except shadowsocks2022, still leak

[M03ED]

there is similar report's in marzban
Gozargah/Marzban#1062
Gozargah/Marzban#992
Gozargah/Marzban#814

[majidsadr]

@M03ED just in case what I was facing was not OOM issue. I couldn't find any reason for the issue. but with another configuration (WS+VMESS) I have about 5k sockstat TCP metrics and there are no issues with connections.

[mmmray]

I think this issue has become about too many things at once (socket/filedescriptor leak versus memory leak) and each of the reports is not very specific. I suggest to attempt these things:

• reduce the amount of inbounds/outbounds per xray process to pin it down to a specific transport/protocol. For example, if you have a node with 6 inbounds, try splitting up the node into two with 3 each, then whichever produces a memory leak, split it up again. try to arrive at a server json config that can reproduce the issue reliably and is free of unnecessary things.
• in case of OOM, once you have a node that has a minimal configuration, use pprof (like the OP) to produce a heap profile. you can follow https://xtls.github.io/en/config/metrics.html#pprof to configure it, although I don't know if it can be done in panels easily.
• rprx and yuhan gave specific questions already (please test all commits in the range, please profile a bigger usage), but i don't see a followup to them.
• if anything about the core developer's response is unclear, please ask, don't just ignore it and post "same here"

[boris768]

i checked original v2ray repository and found same bug
v2fly/v2ray-core#3086

I used the patch from the bug and it seems to have helped with the big leak, at least the process doesn't eat memory as aggressively. tested on 1.8.23 release code

place to patch

Xray-core/transport/pipe/impl.go

Line 92 in 41d03d1

func (p *pipe) ReadMultiBuffer() (buf.MultiBuffer, error) {

applied patch

func (p *pipe) ReadMultiBuffer() (buf.MultiBuffer, error) {
	for {
		data, err := p.readMultiBufferInternal()
		if data != nil || err != nil {
			p.writeSignal.Signal()
			return data, err
		}

		timer := time.NewTimer(15 * time.Minute)
		select {
		case <-p.readSignal.Wait():
		case <-p.done.Wait():
		case <-timer.C: // new add
			return nil, buf.ErrReadTimeout // new add
		case err = <-p.errChan:
			return nil, err
		}
		timer.Stop() // new add
	}
}

[mmmray]

@boris768 Then it seems the real issue might be that some pipe is not correctly closed somewhere, or generally resources are not cleaned up in some inbound/outbound or transport. Unfortunately this patch has the ability to work around a variety of different issues, it doesn't really explain what's going on IMO

[boris768]

@mmmray, i testing this patch, that can be used as hack way to fix memory leak. I using simple XTLS-Reality setup and without fix 8-10 clients gives xray memory usage up to 700-800 mb in one day (OOM kills service). With fix, memory peak usage reaches 150mb.
At least, it gives info about mem leak place, i hope, it will help to fix.

[M03ED]

Is the problem solved ?

[mmmray]

Not completed, but it's missing too much information (for example, what version was it introduced?), nobody has investigated it much, and it's not clear if this is 1 issue or N issues. As a developer I also wouldn't know what to do with it right now. I guess, let's reopen when somebody has managed to make another heap profile or some other discovery. I think the patch cannot help like this, to be honest.

[gelato]

I can confirm that recently this memory leak became the biggest problem with my setup. I can add a few cents to it: it was introduced somewhere within few latest versions and problematic is grpc transport - i haven't observed it anywhere else. If you start downloading something big and at full speed - xray consumes 800 megs of ram in 5 minutes, resulting it being OOMed.

[wrk6]

Hello everyone,

Let me start by saying that I have read all the articles and issues on similar topics, but I haven’t found a definitive and clear solution to this problem. Therefore, I decided to write here, hoping I’m not bothering developers or users too much.

The issues described in #3221 and #3338 do not provide a clear answer to the problem of memory leaks or OOM (Out of Memory). It’s also unclear whether these issues discuss the same problem or different ones.

Perhaps this can revive discussions on the topic. Thank you in advance!

Xray Core version - 24.11.11

[50infivedays]

after a long time of testing , it appears that this is not a memory leak , after i upgrade my machine to larger memory , this problem won't happen, maybe the newer version is just using much more memory .

[wrk6]

after a long time of testing , it appears that this is not a memory leak , after i upgrade my machine to larger memory , this problem won't happen, maybe the newer version is just using much more memory .

You think that 64 gb is not enough?