Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OIP-draft Gateway UX Composer #6

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

benjaminbollen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@benjaminbollen benjaminbollen changed the title draft: initial motivation OIP-draft Gateway UX Composer Dec 5, 2018
benjaminbollen and others added 5 commits December 17, 2018 14:58
Renamed UXC - GC including OIP draft filename as well as wherever it's referenced.
- OSTPrime flow as discussed from forum.
- Rename VBT => BT
- Small cleanup
because the messagebus nonce in gateway locks a single message per staker -
and the UXC contract address is the `staker` for the gateway contract.
A UXC can be (re-)used for multiple gateways in parallel.
and the Gateway contract address is the `staker` for the gateway contract.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@abhayks1 small error from replacing; "... and the Gateway Composer (GC) address is the staker for the gateway contract."

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!
Also updated case of "Gateway composer" to "Gateway Composer" in some places.

@abhayks1
Copy link

abhayks1 commented Jan 3, 2019

@benjaminbollen can you please update pull request title from "OIP-draft Gateway UX Composer" to "OIP-draft Gateway Composer"? I don't have permission to update.

@schemar schemar removed the draft label May 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants