You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hydra seems to be great for building nixpkgs, or a subset of this. I've deployed my own Hydra and have my own local S3 cluster and the two work great.
However, I do not wish to build the (multi-TB) entirety of nixpkgs as my systems deployments requires a significantly tiny number of packages within this.
Instead, I'd like to use Hydra to simply build my systems' toplevels and push the relevant artefacts to the S3 store - then my systems can pull those down without having to do any parts of the builds themselves.
However, this usecase isn't documented in the examples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@alejandro-angulo No, that disables the usage of the binary cache within Hydra.
I want to know exactly what I need to stick on my nixosConfigurations.systemName = nixpkgs.lib.nixosSystem in terms of a hydraJob so Hydra can build these.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hydra seems to be great for building nixpkgs, or a subset of this. I've deployed my own Hydra and have my own local S3 cluster and the two work great.
However, I do not wish to build the (multi-TB) entirety of nixpkgs as my systems deployments requires a significantly tiny number of packages within this.
Instead, I'd like to use Hydra to simply build my systems' toplevels and push the relevant artefacts to the S3 store - then my systems can pull those down without having to do any parts of the builds themselves.
However, this usecase isn't documented in the examples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: