If you use the cabal
executable from the latest version of the
cabal-install package
published on Hackage, it is sufficient to run:
$ cabal build cabal
If you have trouble building the testsuite for this initial build, try building with the release project that excludes this testsuite:
$ cabal build cabal --project-file=cabal.release.project
Note
The default cabal.project
is picked up implicitly as if the
--project-file=cabal.project
explicit option had been given.
For developing, we recommend using the locally built version of cabal
, the
executable, if only because one of the released versions available may be
lacking a fix. This can be installed:
$ cabal install cabal-install:exe:cabal --overwrite-policy=always
It can be run without first installing it with cabal run cabal --
followed by
its own arguments, as shown here for build --help
:
$ cabal run cabal -- build --help
Note
If you're using Nix, you might find it convenient to work within a shell that has the following Cabal
development dependencies:
$ nix-shell -p cabal-install ghc ghcid pkg-config zlib.dev # incomplete
One dependency that we left out in the above command is haskellPackages.fourmolu_0_12_0_0
which would need to be installed manually.
A Nix flake developer shell with these dependencies is also available, supported solely by the community, through the command nix develop github:yvan-sraka/cabal.nix
.
The location of your build products will vary depending on which version of
cabal-install you use to build; see the documentation section
Where are my build products?
to find the binary (or just run find -type f -executable -name cabal
).
Here are some other useful variations on the commands:
$ cabal build Cabal # build library only
$ cabal build Cabal-tests:unit-tests # build Cabal's unit test suite
$ cabal build cabal-tests # etc...
There are two ways to run tests: in CI with GitHub actions and locally with
./validate.sh
.
If you are not in a hurry, the most convenient way to run tests on Cabal is to make a branch on GitHub and then open a pull request; our continuous integration service on GitHub Actions builds and tests your code. Title your PR with WIP so we know that it does not need code review.
Some tips for using GitHub Actions effectively:
-
GitHub Actions builds take a long time. Use them when you are pretty sure everything is OK; otherwise, try to run relevant tests locally first.
-
If you are only changing documentation in the
docs/
subdirectory, or if you changeREADME.md
orCONTRIBUTING.md
, then we only run a small subset of the CI jobs. You can therefore open small PRs with improvements to the documentation without feeling guilty about wasted resources! -
Watch over your jobs on the GitHub Actions website. If you know a build of yours is going to fail (because one job has already failed), be nice to others and cancel the rest of the jobs, so that other commits on the build queue can be processed.
One of the annoying things about running tests on CI is when they fail, there is often no easy way to further troubleshoot the broken build. Here are some guidelines for debugging continuous integration failures:
-
Can you tell what the problem is by looking at the logs? The
cabal-testsuite
tests run with-v
logging by default, which is dumped to the log upon failure; you may be able to figure out what the problem is directly this way. -
Can you reproduce the problem by running the test locally? See the next section for how to run the various test suites on your local machine.
-
Is the test failing only for a specific version of GHC, or a specific operating system? If so, try reproducing the problem on the specific configuration.
-
Is the test failing on a GitHub Actions per-GHC build. In this case, if you click on "Branch", you can get access to the precise binaries that were built by GitHub Actions that are being tested. If you have an Ubuntu system, you can download the binaries and run them directly.
If none of these let you reproduce, there might be some race condition or continuous integration breakage; please file a bug.
The ./validate.sh
script runs all the test suites. It takes
various options to restrict the test suites it runs; use --help
to list them.
To run tests locally with cabal
, you will need to know the
name of the test suite you want. Cabal and cabal-install have
several. Also, you'll want to read Where are my build products?
The most important test suite is cabal-testsuite
: most user-visible
changes to Cabal should come with a test in this framework. See
cabal-testsuite/README.md for more
information about how to run tests and write new ones. Quick
start: use cabal-tests
to run Cabal
tests, and cabal-tests --with-cabal=/path/to/cabal
to run cabal-install
tests
(don't forget --with-cabal
! Your cabal-install tests won't
run without it).
There are also other test suites:
-
Cabal-tests:unit-tests
are small, quick-running unit tests on small pieces of functionality in Cabal. If you are working on some utility functions in the Cabal library you should run this test suite. -
cabal-install:unit-tests
are small, quick-running unit tests on small pieces of functionality in cabal-install. If you are working on some utility functions in cabal-install you should run this test suite. -
cabal-install:long-tests
are QuickCheck tests on cabal-install's dependency solver, VCS, and file monitoring code. If you are working on the solver you should run this test suite. -
cabal-install:integration-tests2
are integration tests on some top-level API functions inside thecabal-install
source code.
For these test executables, -p
which applies a regex filter to the test
names. When running cabal-install
test suites, one need only use cabal test
or
cabal run <test-target>
in order to test locally.
Various other checks done by CI can be run locally to make sure your code doesn't
fail annoyingly once you push it. make checks
will do these checks. The list of
checks is expected to grow over time, to make it easier to avoid CI turnaround on
simple problems.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) is performed to ensure that the changes impacting the command-line interface, whether adding or modifying a behaviour, are tested before being released. This allows us to catch UX regressions and put a human perspective into testing.
Contributions that touch cabal-install
are expected to include notes for the QA team.
They are a description of an expected result upon calling cabal-install
with certain parameters,
and should be written in the body of the ticket or PR under their own heading, like this:
## QA Notes
Calling `cabal haddock-project` should produce documentation for the whole
cabal project with the following defaults enabled:
* Documentation lives in ./haddocks
* The file `./haddocks/index.html` should exist
Manual QA is not expected to find every possible bug, but to really challenge the assumptions of the contributor, and to verify that their own testing of their patch is not influenced by their setup or implicit knowledge of the system.
We use automated formatting, checked in the CI process, to enforce a unified style across the code bases and include these makefile targets to help with formatting:
make style
- Format theCabal
,Cabal-syntax
andcabal-install
directories.make style-modified
- Format files modified in the current tree.make style-commit COMMIT=<ref>
- Format files modified between HEAD and the given reference.
Note
We use fourmolu-0.12.0.0
for formatting. If installing it with cabal install
, please make sure to use a version of GHC >= 9.2.1 && < 9.8
.
Its requirement of GHC2021
sets the lower bound, and its reliance on
ghc-lib-parser
sets the upper bound on GHC versions. A command for
installing it this way is:
$ cabal install fourmolu-0.12.0.0 --overwrite-policy=always --ignore-project
Tip
If you have multiple versions of GHC installed with ghcup
, a series-specific
GHC can be used by adding an option of --with-compiler=ghc-x.y
(for the
latest installed x.y.z
version in the x.y
series) or an option of
--with-compiler=ghc-x.y.z
to the above install command.
$ ghc --numeric-version
9.10.1
$ ghc-9.6 --numeric-version
9.6.6
$ ghc-9.4.8 --numeric-version
9.4.8
If not using the --with-compiler
option then the system ghc
version should
be one in the ghc-9.2
, ghc-9.4
or ghc-9.6
series when installing
fourmolu
.
Warning
If you have need of another fourmolu
version for other work and want to
switch between versions then your options are reinstalling or using a nix shell
or something similar. It is not yet possible to specify development
environment tools within a package with different constraints on dependencies,
see issue-9230.
We use automated whitespace convention checking. Violations can be fixed by
running fix-whitespace. If
you push a fix of a whitespace violation, please do so in a separate commit. For convenience,
make whitespace
will show violations and make fix-whitespace
will fix them, if the
fix-whitespace
utility is installed.
-
Format your commit messages in the standard way.
-
A lot of Cabal does not have top-level comments. We are trying to fix this. If you add new top-level definitions, please Haddock them; and if you spend some time understanding what a function does, help us out and add a comment. We'll try to remind you during code review.
-
If you do something tricky or non-obvious, add a comment.
-
For local imports (Cabal module importing Cabal module), import lists are NOT required (although you may use them at your discretion.) For third-party and standard library imports, please use either qualified imports or explicit import lists.
-
You can use basically any GHC extension supported by a GHC in our support window, except Template Haskell, which would cause bootstrapping problems in the GHC compilation process.
-
Our GHC support window is five years for the Cabal library and three years for cabal-install: that is, the Cabal library must be buildable out-of-the-box with the dependencies that shipped with GHC for at least five years. GitHub Actions checks this, so most developers submit a PR to see if their code works on all these versions of GHC.
cabal-install
must also be buildable on all supported GHCs, although it does not have to be buildable out-of-the-box. Instead, thecabal-install/bootstrap.sh
script must be able to download and install all of the dependencies (this is also checked by CI). Also, self-upgrade to the latest version (i.e.cabal install cabal-install
) must work with all versions ofcabal-install
released during the last three years. -
Cabal
has its own Prelude, inDistribution.Compat.Prelude
, that provides a compatibility layer and exports some commonly used additional functions. Use it in all new modules. -
As far as possible, please do not use CPP. If you must use it, try to put it in a
Compat
module, and minimize the amount of code that is enclosed by CPP. For example, prefer:f :: Int -> Int #ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS f = (+1) #else f = (+2) #endif
over:
#ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS f :: Int -> Int f = (+1) #else f :: Int -> Int f = (+2) #endif
Each major Cabal
/cabal-install
release (e.g. 3.4, 3.6, etc.) has a
corresponding GitHub Project and milestone. A ticket is included in a release's
project if the release managers are tentatively planning on including a fix for
the ticket in the release, i.e. if they are actively seeking someone to work on
the ticket.
By contrast, a ticket is milestoned to a given release if we are open to accepting a fix in that release, i.e. we would very much appreciate someone working on it, but are not committing to actively sourcing someone to work on it.
Every (non-backport) pull request has to go through a review and get 2
approvals. After this is done, the author of the pull request is expected to add
any final touches they deem important and put the merge me
label on the pull
request. If the author lacks permissions to apply labels, they are welcome to
explicitly signal the merge intent on the discussion thread of the pull request,
at which point others (e.g., reviewers) apply the label. Merge buttons are
reserved for exceptional situations, e.g., CI fixes being iterated on or
backports/patches that need to be expedited for a release.
Currently there is a 2 day buffer for potential extra feedback between the last
update of a pull request (e.g. a commit, a rebase, an addition of the merge me
label) and the moment the Mergify bot picks up the pull request for a merge.
If your pull request consists of several commits, consider using squash+merge me
instead of merge me
: the Mergify bot will squash all the commits into one
and concatenate the commit messages of the commits before merging.
There is also a merge+no rebase
label. Use this very sparingly, as not rebasing
severely complicates Git history. It is intended for special circumstances, as when
the PR branch cannot or should not be modified. If you have any questions about it,
please ask us.
A pull request fixes a problem that is described in an issue. Make sure to file an issue before opening a pull request. In the issue you can illustrate your proposed design, UX considerations, tradeoffs etc. and work them out with other contributors. The PR itself is for implementation.
If a PR becomes out of sync with its issue, go back to the issue, update it, and continue the conversation there. Telltale signs of Issue/PR diverging are, for example: the PR growing bigger in scope; lengthy discussions about things that are not implementation choices; a change in design.
If your PR is trivial you can omit this process (but explain in the PR why you think it does not warrant an issue). Feel free to open a new issue (or new issues) when appropriate.
Anything that changes cabal-install:exe:cabal
or changes exports from library
modules or changes behaviour of functions exported from packages published to
hackage is a user-visible change. Raising the
lower bound on base
is most definitely a user-visible change because it
excludes versions of GHC from being able to build these packages.
When opening a pull request with a user-visible change, you should write one changelog entry (or more in case of multiple independent changes) — the information will end up in our release notes.
Changelogs for the next release are stored in the changelog.d
directory.
The files follow a simple key-value format similar to the one for .cabal
files.
Free-form text fields (synopsis
and description
) allow Markdown markup — please,
use markup to make our release notes more readable.
Here's an example:
synopsis: Add feature xyz
packages: cabal-install
prs: #0000
issues: #0000 #0000
significance: significant
description: {
- Detail number 1
- Detail number 2
}
Changelogs may also be written in "markdown-frontmatter" format. This is useful if your
description contains braces, which must be escaped with backslashes in .cabal
file
format. The front matter is in YAML syntax, not .cabal
file syntax, and the file
must begin with a line containing only hyphens.
---
synopsis: Add feature xyz
packages: [cabal-install]
prs: 0000
issues: [0000, 0000]
significance: significant
---
- Detail number 1
- Detail number 2
The package list must be enclosed in square brackets and comma-separated, but this
isn't needed for prs
or issues
; those are free-form and any YAML syntax will
be accepted. Note that the number signs on PR and issue numbers are required in
.cabal
file syntax, but won't work in markdown-frontmatter syntax because they
signify comments in YAML.
Only the synopsis
and prs
fields are required, but you should also set the others where applicable.
Field | Description |
---|---|
synopsis |
Brief description of the change. Often just the pr title. |
description |
Longer description, with a list of sub-changes. Not needed for small/atomic changes. |
packages |
Packages affected by the change (cabal-install , Cabal ...). Omit if it's a non-package change. |
prs |
Space-separated hash-prefixed pull request numbers containing the change (usually just one). |
issues |
Space-separated hash-prefixed issue numbers that the change fixes/closes/affects. |
significance |
Set to significant if the change is significant, that is if it warrants being put near the top of the changelog. |
You can find a large number of real-world examples of changelog files here.
At release time, the entries will be merged with this tool.
In addition, if you're changing the .cabal
file format specification you should
add an entry in doc/file-format-changelog.rst
.
There are a few main venues of communication:
-
Most developers subscribe to receive messages from all issues; issues can be used to open discussion. If you know someone who should hear about a message, CC them explicitly using the @username GitHub syntax.
-
For more organizational concerns, the mailing list is used.
-
Many developers idle on
#hackage
onirc.libera.chat
. The#ghc
channel is also a decently good bet.- You can join the channel using a web client, even anonymously: https://web.libera.chat/#hackage
- Alternatively you can join it using matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#hackage:matrix.org
Notes for how to make a release are at the
wiki page "Making a release".
Currently, @emilypi, @fgaz and @Mikolaj have access to
haskell.org/cabal
, and @Mikolaj is the point of contact for getting
permissions.
We make preview releases available to facilitate testing of development builds.
Artifacts can be found on the cabal-head
release page.
The Validate CI pipeline generates tarballs with a cabal
executable. The executable gets uploaded to this release by the pipelines that run on master
.
We currently make available builds for:
- Linux, dynamically linked (requiring
zlib
,gmp
,glibc
) - Linux, statically linked
- MacOS
- Windows
The statically linked Linux executables are built using Alpine.
To reproduce these locally, set up an Alpine build environment using GHCup,
and then build by calling cabal build cabal-install --enable-executable-static
.
Auto-generated API documentation for the master
branch of Cabal is automatically uploaded here: http://haskell.github.io/cabal-website/doc/html/Cabal/.
You can contribute by triaging issues which may include reproducing bug reports or asking for vital information, such as version numbers or reproduction instructions. If you would like to start triaging issues, one easy way to get started is to subscribe to cabal on CodeTriage.
We are reactive rather than proactive with revising bounds on our dependencies for code already released on Hackage. If you would benefit from a version bump, please, open a ticket and get familiar with our revision policy.
The burden of proof that the bump is harmless remains with you, but we have a CI setup to show that our main pipeline ("Validate") is fine with the bump. To use it, someone with enough permissions needs to go on the Validate workflow page and dispatch it manually by clicking "Run workflow".
Running workflow manually as discussed above allows you to supply two inputs:
allow-newer line constraints line
Going via an example, imagine that Cabal only allows tar
or version less then
or equal to 0.6, and you want to bump it to 0.6. Then, to show that Validate
succeeds with tar
0.6, you should input
tar
to the "allow-newer line"tar ==0.6
to the "constraints line"
Hopefully, running the Validate pipeline with these inputs succeeds and you supply the link to the run in the ticket about bumping the bound and making a revision.
If interested in technical details, refer to the parts of validate.yml
that
mention hackage-revisions
.