Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set up serverless user database #20

Closed
FrancesCoronel opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Set up serverless user database #20

FrancesCoronel opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@FrancesCoronel
Copy link
Member

FrancesCoronel commented Mar 30, 2023

  • Need ability to store user profiles in database
  • Also should integrate with login provider we use
@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel converted this from a draft issue Mar 30, 2023
@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel added the idea Open to feedback on how to iterate on this idea label Mar 30, 2023
@FrancesCoronel
Copy link
Member Author

Supabase is also a good option

@latinadeveloper
Copy link
Member

Supabase is also a good option

nice, I hadn't heard of this one.

@fernperezg97 fernperezg97 moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in Latina Dev Open Source Member Directory May 9, 2023
@fernperezg97
Copy link

Here are some factors to consider when comparing PlanetScale and Supabase:

Feel free to let me know your thoughts, opinions, etc. I can always do more research, of course.

1. Scalability

  • Both PlanetScale and Supabase are scalable, but PlanetScale offers a more scalable solution. PlanetScale provides a serverless, horizontally scalable database that can handle large amounts of data and traffic, while Supabase provides a PostgreSQL-based database that can be horizontally scaled.

2. Real-time data

  • PlanetScale provides real-time data synchronization, making it easy to build real-time applications that require data synchronization across multiple devices or users. Supabase does not have built-in real-time data synchronization, although it provides features like real-time subscriptions.

3. Cost

  • Supabase provides a generous free tier for developers, making it a cost-effective option for small-scale projects. PlanetScale can be more expensive than Supabase, especially for high-traffic applications, which can affect the cost-effectiveness of the project.

4. Learning curve

  • Both PlanetScale and Supabase have a learning curve, but Supabase may be easier to learn for developers who are already familiar with PostgreSQL. PlanetScale requires developers to learn new concepts and technologies, such as Vitess and Kubernetes.

5. Integration

  • Supabase provides a range of integration options with third-party services, making it easy to integrate with existing tools and technologies. PlanetScale has limited integration options, which may limit its use for some projects.

@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel added this to the v2 Launch — Database & User Auth milestone May 13, 2023
@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel changed the title User database in PlanetScale Set up serverless user database May 18, 2023
@FrancesCoronel
Copy link
Member Author

Action item from meeting: looking more into Supabase

@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel added data Related to data idea Open to feedback on how to iterate on this idea work in progress and removed idea Open to feedback on how to iterate on this idea labels May 18, 2023
@FrancesCoronel FrancesCoronel added help wanted Extra attention is needed and removed idea Open to feedback on how to iterate on this idea labels May 27, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Stale issue message

Copy link

This issue is now stale since there have not been any new conversations within the last 3 months. This PR will automatically close in 1 week.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🔖 Ready to ✅ Done in Latina Dev Open Source Member Directory Dec 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants