You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Relations can be used for sorting. So should not be a problem to reuse the code to sort by aggregated values. Also, would be good limit avaialable functions for each type (inspired by nuwave/lighthouse#2487).
Probably the best/easy way is to add a new extra operator aggregate. Need to think how it should look, especially if we want type filtering.
Relations can be used for sorting. So should not be a problem to reuse the code to sort by aggregated values. Also, would be good limit avaialable functions for each type (inspired by nuwave/lighthouse#2487).
Probably the best/easy way is to add a new extra operator
aggregate
. Need to think how it should look, especially if we want type filtering.https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/7DpjCeQyNMUTXx6gTHCRVv/0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: