You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, Coming from HTMX.I feel that EHTML has a different focus and inclination. However, it does offer some additional features from a practical standpoint. I'll try to use both.
The main issue is the library's size. It's 1.8MB, and even the light version is 125KB.
I suggest splitting it into core functionality and implementing other features as plugins or extensions. Maybe to keep the core library size between 30KB and 50KB, and do not exceed above 100KB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mandolin Hi
You can use compression to reduce bandwidth and then caching + CDN to eliminate such problem. I am not really concerned about lib size in my case, because it's almost all JS I need to use in my applications. But if your case is different, feel free to suggest what could be considered as core features, and what should be more suited for plugins.
Thank you.
Hi, Coming from HTMX.I feel that EHTML has a different focus and inclination. However, it does offer some additional features from a practical standpoint. I'll try to use both.
The main issue is the library's size. It's 1.8MB, and even the light version is 125KB.
I suggest splitting it into core functionality and implementing other features as plugins or extensions. Maybe to keep the core library size between 30KB and 50KB, and do not exceed above 100KB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: