Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👔 Handle user-defined motion estimate filters #156

Open
1 task
shnizzedy opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

👔 Handle user-defined motion estimate filters #156

shnizzedy opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@shnizzedy
Copy link
Member

Related problem

This change will require an update to the GUI to generate filters similar to how regressors and handled specially.

― FCP-INDI/C-PAC#1837 (comment)

Proposed feature

Add a specific component like Regressor for handling motion estimate filters

Acceptance criteria

  • GUI can create an arbitrary number of valid motion estimate filters in a pipeline

Alternatives

GUI creates an empty list for motion estimate filters and directs the user to User Documentation » Setting Up A Pipeline Configuration » Pre- and post-processing » Functional Preprocessing: Initial Preprocessing § Configuration Without the GUI

Additional context

If / when we convert the validation schema to JSON Schema, we should revisit the design of these "USER-DEFINED" components (Regreossor and MotionEstimateFilter) to SSOT them, with the source of truth being the validation schema

@shnizzedy shnizzedy added enhancement New feature or request UX user-reported labels Dec 1, 2022
@shnizzedy shnizzedy self-assigned this Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant