Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differences in reconstructed images #601

Open
rasad-hub opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Differences in reconstructed images #601

rasad-hub opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@rasad-hub
Copy link

rasad-hub commented Oct 24, 2024

Hello. I tried to reconstruct the sinogram matrix I got from resolusion-phantom through tigre algorithms and I am sure that I enter the settings of the parameters correctly, but the reconstructed image is different from the image I expect. The photo on the left is related to the same sinogram. And it is reconstructed by a simple command (iradon) and the image on the right is reconstructed by tigre algorithms. Can you guide me, where is the problem?

  • MATLAB version:2023b
  • OS:windows10
  • CUDA version:11.8
@AnderBiguri
Copy link
Member

The only guess I can give you is that you have set the geometry wrong somehow. It also seems that you have not log-transformed your projections either (on both cases).

@AnderBiguri
Copy link
Member

yes, as I don't know if the angles match the measured data, or the geometry is right, it should match what the real thing is, which I don't know. Maybe try negating the angles, or other things.

@rasad-hub
Copy link
Author

yes, as I don't know if the angles match the measured data, or the geometry is right, it should match what the real thing is, which I don't know. Maybe try negating the angles, or other things.

It is possible that this result is due to the tiger version or some mex files are not included during compilation?

@AnderBiguri
Copy link
Member

@rasad-hub no, not at all. Both of your recons look wrong anyway, probably the log-transform, as I said. But TIGRE should work better than matlabs iradon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants